Texts evaluated

 The leftists babble, the right-wingers eat, the anarchists scream: a evaluation guide for pre-election texts

...I’m sick of text-sheets [walls of text]: I like high-quality, small sweets.

A spoonful of sweet preserves with a bit of ice cream.

I don’t need to eat a whole tray of baklava.

I rarely read long texts... they contain too much garbage.

In fact, I’ve found an easy method to figure out the author's political stance.

If the text is relatively short, they are probably right-wing and establishment.

(Establishment right-wingers are generally too bored for many words because they have a lot of business and positions to look after).

Establishment leftists say quite a bit more, since they have to justify their privileged position as appointed leftist intellectuals.

The unappointed leftists, on the other hand, are extremely wordy: they write angry "sheets" [walls of text], mixing mismatched sources with philosophers, historians, economists, and dead revolutionaries.

Souvlakia, lobster pasta, and Brussels sprouts.

The anarcho-autonomists and sympathizers are the most talkative of all.

Massive texts that I think very few people read in full, except for those who write them.

I doubt even their girlfriends read them.

...if they dare, let them test it


Σχόλια

Δημοφιλείς αναρτήσεις από αυτό το ιστολόγιο

Where joy and hope have gone?

Some chick that leaves you with a scar.